|
© Ö Hallberg, Hallberg Independent Research
2009.
Most traffic safety models use regression analysis to find
mathematical expressions linking traffic properties to the
number of killed people per year. It may be the traffic intensity,
average speed, age of the car park, annual driving time or
kilometers etc.
But, so far, very few reports have brought up the simple
fact that you will become a better driver as your driving
experience accumulates over time. The annual reports about
traffic injuries and deaths from Statistics Sweden always
present a graph showing how the risk of being injured declines
by age. An example is given below together with an analysis
of reported and calculated traffic deaths in 1987.

This model was further developed using better computers and
was presented in Lisbon 1997.

The tool was used to extract characteristic functions describing
failure rates for electronics over field use time or as an
other example death risk functions for drivers over accumulated
driving time.
Today, this tool has been developed and specialized for different
purposes. One is being used for the analysis of global warming,
where the temperature response function to increasing levels
of CO2 is found. Another application is the analysis of cancer
statistics to find models of predictive value for future trends.
And the application has also become fine tuned as a tool
for traffic death analysis and projections. This application
will be described in more detail in the following.
Basic principles
- We assume that when the total amount of cars in traffic
is increased by a number X in one year, there will also
be a need , or room, for X number of new, inexperienced
car drivers in the traffic.
- These new drivers will cause traffic deaths at a risk
that will decrease by their driving experience the forthcoming
years
- The total number of deaths will then be the sum of all
drivers' contribution according to the matrix below. Since
people don't live for ever and many do not drive that much
we defined 25 years as the death generating time period
of a drivers life.

The table shows how total deaths are calculated by summation
vertically in the matrix.
A description of this model is also given here: How
to estimate future traffic mortality rates
The latest model development
In cooperation with Swedish Road Administration and Swedish
National Road and Transport Research Institute we further
fine-tuned this model to also include the fact that during
the past 10 years many road kilometers have been rebuilt into
motor ways or ways with separated lanes. This seems to have
a good life saving capability, and it also appears to be quite
predictable.
In this model we used the traffic death statistics reported
between 1975-1985 in order to determine the characteristic
function for driver experience. This function is a log-normal
distribution requiring two parameters, a dispersion and a
median time, here transformed to time to 0,1% deaths.
The new thing is that we now multiplied the vertical summations
shown above with the fraction of the total road network that
still had not separated lanes, taken to the power of another
factor, b. If all roads had the same traffic intensity,
then b would have been equal to 1, but since motor ways and
roads with separated lanes in average transport more cars,
the power b will be > 1. After fine-tuning it turned out
that b=4.84 gave the best fit to reported data.
So, all in all we have to deal with only three parameters
in this model, and this is much less than normally is being
used in traditional regression analysis. Below is shown the
result of the analysis and prediction for the two cases:
The original two parameter model

The model shows that we apparently today have a better traffic
safety than the data from 1975-1985 predicts. Since 1999 we
seem to have saved 649 lives thanks to improved roads
and other technical actions taken by the authorities.
Including increasing fraction of roads having separated
lanes

Conclusions
It looks as we might reach just about 200 deaths in year
2020 assuming the next improvement in economy really shows
up. Otherwise we will most probably see even lower numbers.
So, let's hope for the best!
Örjan Hallberg, Hallberg Independent Research
http://hir.nu
Note.
It is interesting to note that the model used gives a risk
function vs age that is very similar to the one actually reported
by Vägverket (Clic to enlarge).
|

Calculated risk according to model
|

Reported risk according to Vägverket
|
|